Explore

Loss Aversion: Why Losing Hurts More Than Winning Feels Good

by turhan-ergene

A look at prospect theory and loss aversion — why losing something feels worse than gaining the equivalent, and how that one asymmetry quietly drives sunk costs, framing effects and risky decisions. For anyone curious why people act against their own best interests around money and risk.

You're previewing this room. Log in or create a free account to answer the questions and track your progress.
Study material

Prospect theory, developed by Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, says people don't judge outcomes by their final wealth. They judge them against a reference point — usually how things already stood — and a loss relative to that point is felt roughly twice as intensely as an equal-sized gain. A worker whose pay is cut from $50,000 to $45,000 reports feeling considerably worse than a worker who has always earned $45,000, even though both end up with the exact same salary.

Two investors both end the year with $90,000 in their account. Investor A started the year with $100,000 and lost $10,000. Investor B started the year with $80,000 and gained $10,000. According to prospect theory, which investor is likely to feel worse about the year, even though both now hold the same amount of money?

multiple choice

AInvestor B, because gains are felt more intensely than losses
BInvestor A, because the loss is measured against a higher reference point
CNeither, because final wealth is what determines how people feel
DBoth equally, because the dollar amounts involved are the same
Prospect theory says people judge outcomes against a reference point, not against their final bank balance.
Log in to answer

Ready to test yourself?

Sign up free to answer, score points, and build your streak.